Ritter Paving

True, people.

We have given weapons of mass destruction em (with other western nations) in the 70s and 80s to fight against Iran in the Iran-Iraq war. Then, we applauded when they were used to kill thousands of Iranian civilians. We vetoed all resolutions of the Security Council of UN to condemn the use of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq against Iran. We vetoed a resolution that even mentioned the use of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq against Iran. Reagan went so far as to kill a bill that would cut support for Iraq in response to the genocide of Iraqi Kurds, who were aligned with Iran. Then, when Iraq invaded Kuwait for the launch of the economic war against them, the U.S. has reversed 180 degrees in its support for Iraq. We put sanctions on weapons of mass destruction and had destroyed all.

It is a fact that the Iraqi nuclear program, has ceased to exist after 1991. It is a fact that all Iraqi weapons of mass destruction have been destroyed from 1991 to 1995. A bit of chemical weapons has long been forgotten by subsequently found to be regarded as inert, as they were ten ancient ruins of the Iran-Iraq and was long past their shelf life of 5 years.

Scott Ritter, former chief arms inspector for the UN in Iraq 1991-1998, stated publicly before the invasion of Iraq that 90-95% of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction capability had been "eliminated verifiable "and that chemical munitions remaining in Iraq posed no credible military threat. Scott Ritter was proven correct when * surprise, not of mass destruction were used against U.S. troops and * no * surprise has been found in Iraq. His pre-war findings were also confirmed by the Iraq Study Group, which then concluded he had "found no evidence that Saddam possessed WMD stocks in 2003," they recognized "the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq, but not a significant military capacity. "They also concluded that" Saddam wanted to recreate Iraq's WMD capabilities on which was essentially destroyed in 1991. "

Of course, they can speculate on the basis of circumstantial evidence that Saddam wanted to "recreate" the WMD capabilities, but is far from insisting it was the imminent threat with chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction that was the sell to terrorist organizations.

The reason why the inspectors were expelled from Iraq in first place (in 1998) because they were captured to be used as political spies and CIA agents to gather information unrelated to the alleged weapons of destruction capabilities mass of Iraq, in violation of a UN mandate. The subsequent 1998 bombing of Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction facilities" was in reality a system of bombing Iraq for military defense and defense infrastructure to pave the way for war in Iraq the Using WMD to justify (although it is clear at the time of the attack they don 't exist).

Is not America great? The Iraq war was planned even before Bush took office.

Yes, all the modems know .... but do not tell the truth to conservatives, it hurts their feelings.

Bush / Cheney challenged crimes were well documented in Dennis Kusinich report to Congress

Old news. Everybody knows. Wake up.

Yawn!

I do not know if the information displayed is accurate or not. I do not think so.

But if this is true, then Bill Clinton (who said they had and might use them) lied about it, and any "lying about sex."

Yup at the hearing on United Nations weapons inspectors said on CSPAN document that was supposed to be a recipt was a fake bad. France and the inspectors have said both weapons of mass destruction were a possibility almost zero if
We have a big problem with the way our country is supported.

You're right, the war in Iraq was planned before Bush took office. All that has to do is read this speech by Bill Clinton in 1998.